Project #23998 - domestic violence

Paper #3— Domestic Violence Analysis

(100 points, 20 percent)

LEARNING OUTCOMES: After completing this project, students should be able to:

1. distinguish among the complexities and multifaceted nature of domestic violence to assess institutional, community, and individual responses.

2. apply knowledge of research and theory of domestic violence to identify the scope of the issue within society and dispel commonly held misconceptions.

3. locate and evaluate resources relevant to domestic violence issues inorder to effect social change.

 

ASSIGNMENT:

 

1. Select one of the following five paper topics for a 4 page double spaced paper (12 font):

A.  Analyze the music lyrics about relationships and violence within a specific music genre (i.e., pop, country, rap, jazz, folk, etc.)  OR

B.  Read the Old and New Testament of the Bible and identify examples of domestic violence (implicit or explicit).  Identify other examples of violence or intolerance and analyze the messages.  OR

C.  Observe who parents discipline theor children in a public place.  How frequently do parents use physical punishment to discipline their children?  For what situations?  Try to observe in different locations and see whether the setting, situation, and social class of the parents influences their public behavior.  OR

D.  Write to a television broadcasting company to either: a) complain about a  show that contributes to domestic violence problems; OR b) commend them for a show that helps society to deal with such problems.  OR

E.  Create a Public Awareness Campaign (PAC).  You have been presented the task of creating a PAC to address a form of domestic violence.  Assume you have a reasonable amount of funding to carry out your campaign on a national level.  What type of domestic violence would you focus on and why?

 

 In preparing your project, pay attention to the rubric below.

 

Scoring of Paper #3 (100 points)

Category

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Overall Summary

(50 points)

 

Includes most relevant readings and sources, able to grasp the intended argument as it was correctly applied to the project; No misspellings or grammatical errors in materials;

Source information collected for all graphics, facts, and quotes. All documented in desired format.

(50 points)

project was succient and makes good connections between thesis and evidence; A few minor misspellings and/or mechanical errors in materials. 

Source information collected for all graphics, facts, and quotes. Most documented in desired format.

 (40 points)

Argument presented needed more support to strengthen it.  

Source information collected for all graphics, facts, and quotes but not documented in desired format.

 

(30 points)

Several misspellings and/or mechanical errors in materials that detract from the presentation.

Did not make effective use of outside sources or connect key terms to project; Very little or no source information collected

 (15 points)

Content

(50 points)

Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.

Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive and show a deep understanding of theory to help connect ideas.

(50 points)

Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.

Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Incorporates relevant references and theory (40 points)

Several misspellings and/or mechanical errors in materials that may detract from the presentation.

Includes essential information about the topic, but there are a few factual errors. Incorporates relevant references Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. Use of theory is not evident.

(20 points)

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. Incorporates relevant references to fewer than four scholarly sources; Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit; no theory included in paper.

 (10 points)

PLEASE use good grammer and absolutely no plagiarism. I will be checking.

Subject English
Due By (Pacific Time) 03/01/2014 04:00 pm
Report DMCA
TutorRating
pallavi

Chat Now!

out of 1971 reviews
More..
amosmm

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews
More..
PhyzKyd

Chat Now!

out of 1164 reviews
More..
rajdeep77

Chat Now!

out of 721 reviews
More..
sctys

Chat Now!

out of 1600 reviews
More..
sharadgreen

Chat Now!

out of 770 reviews
More..
topnotcher

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews
More..
XXXIAO

Chat Now!

out of 680 reviews
More..
All Rights Reserved. Copyright by AceMyHW.com - Copyright Policy