Project #49330 - 4 Assignments

 

Please Please Please No Plagiarism. My school sends all work through a Plagiarism checker. I also send my work through it before release my payment to make sure everything is cited and is less than 5 percent Plagiarized. There are 4 different assignments here.

 

Assignment # Exclusionary Rule Evaluation

Complete the following CJi Interactive activity:

  • Ch. 6: The Police and the Constitution > Myths & Issues Videos > Issue 2: Exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule

Write a 875 to 1,400-word paper in which you analyze the rationale and purpose of the exclusionary rule and identify exceptions to the exclusionary rule. In your analysis, state the costs and benefits of the exclusionary rule, as well as alternative remedies to the rule. State your position on the exclusionary rule and provide support for your position.

Incorporate information from the CJi Interactive activity in your paper.

Include at least two peer reviewed references.
Format
your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

 

Here are links to complete this assignment

http://media.pearsoncmg.com/pcp/pcp_94869_mutchnick_cj_uop/chapter6/ch6_issue2/index.html

https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/secure/aapd/UC/CJ/index.html

 

Assignment # Search and Seizure Paper

Write a 660 paper in which you define right of privacy, search, seizure, arrest, and reasonableness. Examine how each of these terms may apply to the following:

 

  • Stop-and-frisk
  • Automobile search rules
  • Requirements regarding border and regulatory searches

 

Include at least four peer reviewed references.

Format
your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

 

 

Assignment#Supreme Court Case Analysis

Listen to the audio recording of the oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Miranda vs. Arizona.

 

Prepare a 700- to 1,050- word summary of the argument of the case. Include the following:

 

  • Briefly describe the facts of the case.
  • When was the case argued?
  • Which lawyers argued the case for each side?
  • Summarize the arguments of counsel regarding self-incrimination.
  • Why is the case significant with respect to the right to counsel and self-incrimination?

 

Format your summary consistent with APA guidelines.

 

Here is the link to the audio I found on google

 

https://archive.org/details/USSupremeCourtMirandavArizonaOralArgument1966

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment# Jury Trial Analysis

 

Write a 1400- to 1,700- word analysis in which you identify and discuss the steps in a jury trial. In your analysis be sure to assess the constitutional trial rights that are enacted during a jury trial, as well as examine and discuss the selection of a fair and unbiased jury.

 

Include at least three peer reviewed references.

Format
your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

 

 

 

Subject Law
Due By (Pacific Time) 12/01/2014 07:00 pm
Report DMCA
TutorRating
pallavi

Chat Now!

out of 1971 reviews
More..
amosmm

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews
More..
PhyzKyd

Chat Now!

out of 1164 reviews
More..
rajdeep77

Chat Now!

out of 721 reviews
More..
sctys

Chat Now!

out of 1600 reviews
More..
sharadgreen

Chat Now!

out of 770 reviews
More..
topnotcher

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews
More..
XXXIAO

Chat Now!

out of 680 reviews
More..
All Rights Reserved. Copyright by AceMyHW.com - Copyright Policy