Project #60211 - review

  Everyday Life in Ancient Rome,

Book Review Format

 

Your book reviews should be no less than 4-6 double spaced pages in length and should attempt to answer most of the questions below:

           

I.  Introduction

A.  Introduce your review appropriately. Identify the author, the title, the main topic or issue presented in the book and the author's purpose in writing the book. 

B.  Explain Relationships.  Establish your position as the reviewer (your thesis about the author's thesis).  As you write, consider the following questions:

·         What type of book is this?  (Is the book a memoir, a treatise, a collection of facts, an extended argument, etc.?  Is the article a documentary, a write-up of primary research, a position paper, etc.)?

·         Who is the author?  What does the preface or foreword tell you about the author's purpose, background, and credentials?  What is the author's approach to the topic (as a journalist? a historian? a researcher?)?

·         What is the main topic or problem addressed?  How does the work relate to a discipline, to a profession, to a particular audience, or to other works on the topic?  Who’s the audience for this book?

·         What is your critical evaluation of the work (your thesis or stance)?  Why have you taken that position?  What criteria are you basing your position on?

C.  Provide an Overview.  What are the author’s basic premises for writing this book?  What issues are raised, or what themes emerge?  What situation(s) provide a basis for the author's assertions?  List any background information that is relevant to the entire book and should be placed here rather than in a body paragraph.

II. Evaluate the book.  This is the heart of your book review.  You should discuss a variety of issues here:

  • How clearly is the book written?
  • Did the author achieve his goal?  How did he do this or fall short? 
  • What are the author's most important points?  List at least two examples of how the author proved or did not prove points he was trying to make.
  • What did you like best about the book?  What did you like least about the book?
  • What does the book tell us about the historical period that the book discusses?

Make sure that you distinguish your personal views from that of the author. 

III. Conclusion.  Tie together any issues raised in the review and provide a concise comment on the book and whether or not you would recommend this book to someone else. 

There is, of course, no set formula, but a general rule of thumb is that the first one-half to two-thirds of the review should summarize the author's main ideas while the remainder of the report should evaluate the book.

 

 

Subject History
Due By (Pacific Time) 03/01/2015 12:00 am
Report DMCA
TutorRating
pallavi

Chat Now!

out of 1971 reviews
More..
amosmm

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews
More..
PhyzKyd

Chat Now!

out of 1164 reviews
More..
rajdeep77

Chat Now!

out of 721 reviews
More..
sctys

Chat Now!

out of 1600 reviews
More..
sharadgreen

Chat Now!

out of 770 reviews
More..
topnotcher

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews
More..
XXXIAO

Chat Now!

out of 680 reviews
More..
All Rights Reserved. Copyright by AceMyHW.com - Copyright Policy