Project #83579 - ECPA

In an investigation being conducted by the state crime lab, senior investigators have called your company, AB Investigative Services, to provide advice concerning the interception of wire, electronic, and oral communications. The current individual suspected to be the source of the crime used a library computer to send and receive e-mails. The librarian walked up on the e-mail account while the suspect was away and found incriminating information in an open e-mail, which was reported to law enforcement.

    • Define how the forensic investigator could interpret one aspect of one of the following statutes in relation to the given scenario using:
      • 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-22 Wire and Electronic Communications Interception and Interception of Oral Communications and,
      • 18 U.S.C. §§ 3121-27 Pen Registers and Trap and Trace Devices
    • In your opinion, how can the interpretation be misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted by a forensic investigator?

    • Defend how the First and Fourth Amendments apply or do not apply to the email in this case.
    • What other aspects could be misinterpreted based on current technologies?

Subject Law
Due By (Pacific Time) 09/25/2015 02:00 pm
Report DMCA
TutorRating
pallavi

Chat Now!

out of 1971 reviews
More..
amosmm

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews
More..
PhyzKyd

Chat Now!

out of 1164 reviews
More..
rajdeep77

Chat Now!

out of 721 reviews
More..
sctys

Chat Now!

out of 1600 reviews
More..
sharadgreen

Chat Now!

out of 770 reviews
More..
topnotcher

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews
More..
XXXIAO

Chat Now!

out of 680 reviews
More..
All Rights Reserved. Copyright by AceMyHW.com - Copyright Policy