Project #88479 - Placement options

Please read carefully: only accept if you can do this assignment according to the rubric 

 

Conduct research and locate a minimum of five scholarly journal articles regarding the benefits and challenges of self-contained, inclusion, and resource room placement settings for individuals with mild to moderate disabilities. Your research articles should also encompass the effects of these placement options on both individuals with mild to moderate disabilities and individuals without exceptionalities.

In a 500-750 word response:

  1. Identify how an individual’s patterns of learning and development, interests, and cultural and linguistic factors affect decisions leading to placement; and
  2. Analyze specific strategies that facilitate integration ofindividuals with exceptionalities into the placement options described and how they maximize positive social interaction, create meaningful academic engagement, and increase self-motivation.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

20.0 % Factors of Placement Decisions
No submission.
Analysis is incomprehensible or unrelated to assignment.
Analysis is inadequate and not fully developed. Research not provided or not supportive of position.
Analysis is basic and clear. Argument for placement option decisions was appropriate, but lacking detail. Description is supported with research.
Comprehensive, professional analysis of individual patterns leading to placement decisions. Convincing argument for placement option decisions based on learning and development, interests, and cultural linguistic factors. Description is well supported with research.
25.0 % Evidence-Based Placement Decisions
No submission.
Analysis is incomprehensible or unrelated to assignment.
Analysis is inadequate and not fully developed. Research not provided or not supportive of position.
Analysis is basic and clear. Argument of evidence-based placement options was appropriate, but lacking detail. Description is supported with research.
Comprehensive, professional analysis of evidence-based placement options. Argument of evidence-based placement options thoroughly validates specific characteristics of individuals with exceptionalities. Description is well supported with research.
20.0 % Least Restrictive Environment
No submission.
Analysis is incomprehensible or unrelated to assignment.
Analysis is inadequate and not fully developed. Research not provided or not supportive of position.
Analysis is basic and clear. Argument for implications of placement was appropriate, but lacking detail. Description is supported with research.
Analysis clarifies legal requirements of LRE with great detail. Argument for implications of placement thoroughly examined. Description is well supported
25.0 % Integration Strategies
No submission.
Analysis is incomprehensible or unrelated to assignment.
Analysis is inadequate and not fully developed. Research not provided or not supportive of position.
Analysis is basic and clear. Argument for integration strategies was appropriate, but lacking detail.
Thorough, realistic analysis of integration strategies for various settings that maximize positive social interaction, meaningful academic engagement, and increase self-motivation. Convincing rationale for chosen integration strategies supported. Description is well supported with research.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing
No submission.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors that distract the reader. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
Paper is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer is clearly aware of audience; uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the target audience, and communicates clearly.
Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. It is free of mechanical and conventional errors.
5.0 % APA Formatting and Citations
No submission.
APA formatting is inconsistently used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Fewer than three sources are included.
APA formatting is used although some errors may be present. Elements may be missing such as introduction, conclusion, or headings. Reference page is included and sources are documented although some errors may be present. Title page is missing components. At least three sources are included.
APA formatting is present and appropriate. The style is usually correct although some components may be missing such as introduction paragraph, conclusion, etc. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Title page has all necessary components. At least four sources are included.
Writer has a clear understanding of APA formatting and included all necessary components. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Title page has all necessary components. At least five sources are included.
100 % Total Weightage
 

 

 

Subject General
Due By (Pacific Time) 10/22/2015 08:00 am
Report DMCA
TutorRating
pallavi

Chat Now!

out of 1971 reviews
More..
amosmm

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews
More..
PhyzKyd

Chat Now!

out of 1164 reviews
More..
rajdeep77

Chat Now!

out of 721 reviews
More..
sctys

Chat Now!

out of 1600 reviews
More..
sharadgreen

Chat Now!

out of 770 reviews
More..
topnotcher

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews
More..
XXXIAO

Chat Now!

out of 680 reviews
More..
All Rights Reserved. Copyright by AceMyHW.com - Copyright Policy